Mitsubishi Zero Megaupload P51 Mustang Or Mitsubishi Zero?

P51 mustang or mitsubishi zero? - mitsubishi zero megaupload

Both machines are particularly good, but the P-51 had a edge.History speak for the others.

18 comments:

Jonathan Jeon said...

Served in fact, P-51 in the Pacific and other 426th/457th with 10 FG, accompanied by B-29 to Tokyo from Iwo Jima. It is eqiped models P-51D-25/20 with K-14 gyro Focus. They had a number of Japanese fighting substential kills. Zero (A6M7) were not very rich in those days, and there would be no match for superior fighter than vertically, or P-47 Mustang.

What American P-51 was found Nakamichi Hayate and other fighters who still considered "zeros".

During this campaign, more than 130 P-51 lost due to have lost ground fire, with 99 drivers. But as a long-range escorts, it was found that the P-51 can beat any fighter in Japan.

Jonathan Jeon said...

Served in fact, P-51 in the Pacific and other 426th/457th with 10 FG, accompanied by B-29 to Tokyo from Iwo Jima. It is eqiped models P-51D-25/20 with K-14 gyro Focus. They had a number of Japanese fighting substential kills. Zero (A6M7) were not very rich in those days, and there would be no match for superior fighter than vertically, or P-47 Mustang.

What American P-51 was found Nakamichi Hayate and other fighters who still considered "zeros".

During this campaign, more than 130 P-51 lost due to have lost ground fire, with 99 drivers. But as a long-range escorts, it was found that the P-51 can beat any fighter in Japan.

Phoenix said...

If I fight fight to sit in one and a dog, I would take the P-51D Mustang.

"The best of the P-51D Mustang was powered by Packard built Merlin V12 engine that produces about 1,700 horsepower. This machine can do about 440 mph in level flight, with six machine guns in the wing of laminar flow and can rockets or 2,000 pounds of explosives will be installed in order to attack missions on the ground.
This machine, when it was fitted with drop tanks, the formation of American bombers, support and return goals, a feat no other single-engined fighters could reach it a good administration. "The Mustang is a hound highly competent," the (put into force to intercept any fighters training, to allow the appearance of the Me-262 jets and take up to a certain extent with rocket propelled Me163 aircraft before the meat more easily if the spent fuel). "

Yes, that was the zero is a very powerful fighter in the Pacific theater. Although no one was very agile and has a rapid ascent. He also had a top speed of only 350 km / h, a service of the CISLing 38,500 feet and a range of over 1170 miles to fight.

The zero was armed with a "couple" of 7.7 mm Vickers machine gun type. Each gun comes with 500 rounds of ammunition. In addition, a 20 millimeter cannon with 60 rounds, mounted on each wing. (This is fairly low, 6 heavy machine guns compared to the Mustang.) Zeros had no armor or bulletproof glass. In contrast, zero-base for the survival of their maneuverability and high rise.

Zero, once the fighting is feared in the Pacific, most, now with new fighters from the United States replaced stronger. If you were not ready to die in a suicide bombing, the Mustang, with its excellent speed and raw materials amorments my choice of a single-seater fighter plane. Consideration was given to a dog quite capable fighter aircraft.

I was born in 1937 and was informed on these and other fighters - P38 to another of my favorites. We saw the news reels at the theater and read the Life magazine with a passion and newspapers. Even if I CANADIAn almost alll of the top American generals were my heroes, as the drivers of heavy bombers.

whatwhat... said...

P51, of course.

In fact, never fought Zero P51 - the Mustang was in the European theater - while zero only in the Pacific.

The real questions are:
Zero or Wildcat / Hellcat
or
Mustang vs. 109.

Look at the military channel for more information on these comparisons.

whatwhat... said...

P51, of course.

In fact, never fought Zero P51 - the Mustang was in the European theater - while zero only in the Pacific.

The real questions are:
Zero or Wildcat / Hellcat
or
Mustang vs. 109.

Look at the military channel for more information on these comparisons.

gromit80... said...

When the P-51 flying in the Pacific Theater was the cream of Japanese naval pilots lost their lives.

Thus, a direct comparison is problematic. The Mustang was awaken faster in a straight line for the promotion, and in one. Better armor and hit high-caliber .50.

The A6M could try a P-51, if the driver was stupid enough to get into a close combat.

In general, P-51 won 99% of the time.

brian L said...

The P-51 is the best aircraft in every respect. The zero is not as slow moving and not increase as fast and does not resort dive so quickly. ends in the game of the series of Mustang. The only thing one had zero mustang was a 20-mm gun. This does not by any stretch.

Yo said...

Moreover, the zeros have become is that the low-cost flights and combustible materials. The Mustang was one lap later, and only later in the day. In addition to the P-51 is better, and good looks are is half the battle! P-51 has my vote.

Rangerfa... said...

wat ur doing so, is the two planes from different eras of the war compared. Obviously wins p51. But if the zero in other aircraft of its time, they beat everything except for the F6F Hellcat.

kenbgray said...

P51 road together. This was one of the best fighters in the world has ever seen. I see him occasionally away on the local airport. I live in Beverly MA

kenbgray said...

P51 road together. This was one of the best fighters in the world has ever seen. I see him occasionally away on the local airport. I live in Beverly MA

blj63 said...

In any case, the Mustang

audicama... said...

I think a better comparison would be a P-51 and I-109.

Errka said...

provide us with pictures and perhaps we can better respond

briann f said...

Null

red.baro... said...

Fiat CR42

zephyr said...

They have never fought in the Pacific is that not a fair comparison if the F4U Corsair vs. Zero, I'd say it's a tough fight with the F4U had an advantage in speed over the magnificent manuverability Zero.
If your question is based on racial results, I would be my bottom dollar for the Mustang, COS bet is mean zero May with the P51 or more 440-450/mph velocity and acceleration F4U. F4Us The Japanese pilots as "Whistling Death".

zephyr said...

They have never fought in the Pacific is that not a fair comparison if the F4U Corsair vs. Zero, I'd say it's a tough fight with the F4U had an advantage in speed over the magnificent manuverability Zero.
If your question is based on racial results, I would be my bottom dollar for the Mustang, COS bet is mean zero May with the P51 or more 440-450/mph velocity and acceleration F4U. F4Us The Japanese pilots as "Whistling Death".

Post a Comment